Following on from yesterday’s papercut Valentine heart design, I have now cut the same design, to get a filigree Valentine heart woodcut:
Here is a YouTube video of me cutting it with the laser machine (an Epilog Fusion Edge).
I’m really pleased with how these look – either as papercuts or from wood, and at small or large scale.
In fact, I’m so pleased with the design that I’m going to put it for sale on my shop. Woohoo! Or rather, Woo Commerce!
While cutting this I was listening to the audiobook of Joanna Penn’s newly-released “How to Write Non-Fiction” (second edition). There are a LOT of useful tips in there, which I will hopefully be putting into practice later this year. I am feeling very creative at the moment, and so 2025 seems like I might be able to plan ahead far enough to actually start achieving some goals.
I’ve got loads of projects and designs that I’m working on, so I hope they all turn out as well as this design. This is what the filigree hearts look like when they’ve been cut out and are hanging up on a wall:
Do you like the design? Could I improve it? Let me know in the comments below!
This is a hand-cut filigree Valentine heart papercut design I’ve been working on recently, so I can make it easier to fit the names and ‘&’ ampersand into the design:
I like this one because when it’s cut out the names don’t immeditely jump out. You have to concentrate on them a bit if you’re just looking at the overall design.
I’ve managed to cut it quite well, too – there are enough inconsistencies to made it obvious that it’s a hand-cut piece, but not so many mistakes that I’d rather have done it with the laser cutter. Having said that, I’m also going to try cutting it with the laser, to make sure that the design works at a slightly different scale. I’ll cut it from paper and then from wood. I think that on the laser it will be more successful in wood rather than paper. It might look quite delicate, but actually it seems to be surprisingly sturdy when you hang it up.
Hopefully it will be on my shop soon, or maybe on my Amazon Handmade shop. Just look out for ‘Filigree Valentine Heart papercut’. I’ll put a hand-cut and laser-cut version for sale. It takes me about 2 hours to cut by hand, so the hand-cut version will obviously be more expensive.
Today I put a short video on TikTok and YouTube (and a couple of other social media sites) comparing two papercuts. I asked, “Hand-Cut or Laser-Cut”? This is the design from a previous post, where I got ChatGPT/DALL-E to help me design a Valentine heart. I then cut it two different ways; by hand and by laser.
Here is a closer look at the two pieces. Can you tell which is which?:
(Before anyone mentions it – I realise I accidentally cut off the little heart above the doves’ heads in version 2. Oops!)
So…the one on the left is the hand-cut version:
…and here is the same section done by laser:
There is one easy way to tell them apart, without even having to look at detailed closeups. The stand-out difference is that the rightmost one is a tiny bit brown, due to smoke in the lasercutting machine. To successfully create a papercut with a laser machine, you quite often have to turn off the ‘air assist’. I might do a separate post one day on why, but the relevance here is that the smoke isn’t blown away as efficiently, so the paper goes a bit toasted.
The other main difference is usually only visible at closer range. It’s that the cutting is a bit more jagged or lumpy in some places. Having said that though, (1) it took me less than an hour to cut this one out by hand, so that explains why some parts aren’t as finished as they could be, (2) there’s nothing to stop me going back and tidying up the sharper angles if I need to.
At very close range it becomes even more obvious which is which. Lasercutting machines work by burning the paper away. So if you see (or smell!) a laser-cut piece of paper it will almost always have toasted edges. They often look like the edges of the cuts are slightly serrated, too, depending on the laser’s settings.
Compare the laser version above with the handmade version below. The image below doesn’t have the singed brown outlines on the shapes:
Which version is ‘better’?
I honestly can’t decide, because they both serve different purposes. If I want to do some relaxing, therapeutic papercutting as a hobby, then hand cutting is the way to go. But if I want to turn the artwork into a Valentine card, lasercutting is the best way to do that, otherwise I’d have to charge about £20 per card, which most people aren’t willing to pay. The laser gives me the ability to reproduce papercut artworks (in the same way that painters create prints of their works to put onto cards). So if someone wants one of my designs they can either go for the affordable version or the premium handmade version.
If you’d like to cut this design for yourself, I’ve adapted and created it as an SVG in my shop and Etsy shop.
My “An AI Made Me Do It” project continues, in 2025. This time I have used ChatGPT’s DALL-E to help me create an AI-designed Valentine heart.
Below is a link to the YouTube video below showing how I did it:
First I gave DALL-E a prompt:
“Please could you create a design for a papercut Valentine’s card? It should be made from a single sheet of white paper, with red paper in the background.”
They contain some great elements, but both are just a little bit too fiddly in some parts. So I asked the AI to make them simpler. After two more attempts of me giving it instructions, here is what ChatGPT / DALL-E came up with:
Not bad! But AI still has a problem understanding how to design for papercutting. If it’s creating a papercut then all of the design elements must be attached to at least one other element. Because of that, there are almost always a few ‘orphan’ pieces in the design. The most obvious one here is the little heart above the heads of the two doves. If I cut this design without making any changes, that heart would drop out because it’s not attached to anything.
The next stage was to convert the design to an SVG (scaled vector graphics) file. Here is an article about what SVG files are, but basically they’re an international standard of file that can be recognised by most cutting machines and printers. I usually use SVGs for my laser cutting, but in this case I was going to do a hand-cut version of the design, so why did I need to adapt it to an SVG instead of just printing out the .webp format?
Why use SVG format?
I knew I was going to try to cut it by laser after I’d cut it by hand, so would need the SVG lines to show the laser where to cut.
I wanted to make the file available to other people to download later. SVGs allow them to be able to cut it or print it on whatever printer or cutter they are using.
Even though I’d already noted that the little heart above the doves wasn’t connected to anything, unless I actually tweaked the design to show it linked to another element then there was a danger I’d forget to link it and it would then drop out of the design when I cut it.
With vector files, you can manipulate the ‘nodes’ on the vector lines so that they look exactly how you want them. This makes the design really clear. In the example screenshot and video below, I am using a program on my iPad to move the nodes of the lines so that they look just as I want them:
Once I’d created the SVG file, I could then just print it out as a line drawing, and use the lines as guides for my knife.
For people who don’t like the yucky sentiments of standard Valentine’s Day cards, here is an experimental version of a non-mushy Valentine card. This is another laser-cut card, cut by my Epilog Fusion Edge machine.
It’s got all of the twiddly filigree bits of a laser-cut card, but without the saccharine sentiment 🙂
Although now that I think about it, I didn’t put any particularly sweet sentiments on my personalised letter ‘A’ card, either. Maybe I’ll try to come up with a non-heart version next, to make it as unsentimental as possible. That would be the ultimate non-mushy Valentine card 😀
Recently my mum’s friend got married, so I made a wedding heart woodcut for them. It’s a laser-cut filigree heart, personalised with the name of the bride and groom.
Here’s a YouTube video of the lasercutter (Epilog Fusion Edge) doing its thing and cutting out the wooden heart:
The design still needed a couple of tweaks at the time I took this video, but on the whole I’m really pleased with it. It would be great for Valentine’s Day, or even better for a wooden (fifth) anniversary gift. I like the flowing lines, and the way that the names fit in with the rest of the design elements. This version was a test that I did in cheap laserply wood, but the final version was more substantial and yet it still looked really delicate. I’m thinking about putting this design (although with different names, obvs) on Etsy. Maybe I’ll put it on Amazon Handmade as well. But I’ll also put it here on my shop page.
The overall wedding heart woodcut design is by me, but some of the elements came from a licence that I bought a few years ago from Vectorstock. (Here is a link back to when I explained about saving design time by using pre-existing designs.)
Recently I was asked to do a demo for Leeds Marquetry Group (LMG) on how I created marquetry jewellery. So I created a quick video demo of how to make a simple marquetry flower. The trouble with marquetry demos is that it’s difficult for a lot of people to see what you’re doing at the same time. And with miniature marquetry demos, that goes double!
(If you want to compare it with the laser-cut version of a marquetry flower that I did a few years ago, here is the link.)
So I’ve included the video here, to show what I demonstrated.
It’s definitely not perfect because it’s just a quick demo that I threw together in the space of about an hour – but I’m pleased with how snugly the wooden pieces fit together. Remember as well that the flower’s diameter is only about 14mm. So it looks worse through a magnifying glass and blown up on this screen!
My overall advice to the group was basically that there’s no magic to creating tiny marquetry designs for jewellery. You just need a cutting mat, a sharp knife, and a magnifying glass. Then just keep hacking away at the wood until it does what you want.
Even with the miniature dogs that I put into cufflinks, there weren’t any surprising hints or tips that I could give to the members of the marquetry group. I honestly just look through my magnifying glass and keep hacking tiny bits off the wood. It’s almost like carving it, but at a very small scale – until it looks like it’s the right shape.
